Alternatives
SSHFS vs Rclone
Comparing SSHFS and Rclone - SSH mounting vs cloud storage sync
SSHFS mounts remote filesystems over SSH, while Rclone syncs to cloud storage. Different tools for different remote access needs!
Quick comparison
| Feature | SSHFS | Rclone |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Use | Mount SSH servers | Cloud storage ops |
| Protocol | SSH/SFTP only | Multiple protocols |
| Operation Type | Real-time mount | Batch sync/mount |
| Cloud Support | ❌ No | ✅ 70+ providers |
| Performance | Network-dependent | Can cache locally |
| Setup Complexity | Simple (SSH only) | Varies by provider |
Key differences
SSHFS (SSH filesystem mount)
- Mounts remote SSH server as local folder
- Real-time access with no local storage used
- Simple setup—just need SSH access
- Every operation goes directly over network
Rclone (multi-protocol tool)
- Syncs, copies, and mounts various storage types
- Supports 70+ cloud providers and protocols
- Optional caching for better performance
- Can also mount SFTP (like SSHFS) with extra features
When to use each tool
| Scenario | Better Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Edit code on remote server | SSHFS | Real-time, direct SSH access |
| Access Google Drive files | Rclone | Native cloud support |
| Browse remote Linux server | SSHFS | Simple, immediate access |
| Backup server to cloud | Rclone | Direct cloud upload |
| Development on remote | SSHFS | Low latency for edits |
Common Commands
SSHFS examples:
sshfs user@server:/path /local/mount # Basic mount
sshfs user@server:/ /mnt -o reconnect # With auto-reconnect
sshfs -p 2222 user@server:/ /mnt/remote # Custom portRclone examples:
rclone mount gdrive: /mnt/gdrive --daemon # Mount cloud
rclone mount sftp: /mnt/server --daemon # Mount SFTP (like SSHFS!)
rclone mount remote: /mnt --vfs-cache-mode full # With cachingPerformance & Features
What SSHFS Does Better
- Simplicity: Just SSH, no configuration needed
- Real-time: Changes are immediate on server
- Low overhead: Minimal local resources used
- Direct access: No sync delays or conflicts
What Rclone Offers Instead
- Caching: Can cache files locally for speed
- Cloud native: Direct integration with cloud APIs
- Versatility: Mount, sync, copy, serve capabilities
- Resilience: Better retry and error handling
# SSHFS - direct but network-dependent
sshfs user@server:/ /mnt
# Rclone - can cache for performance
rclone mount sftp:/ /mnt --vfs-cache-mode fullDecision matrix
Need to mount remote files?
├─ SSH server only?
│ ├─ Simple mount? → SSHFS
│ ├─ Need caching? → Rclone SFTP
│ └─ Real-time edit? → SSHFS
├─ Cloud storage? → RCLONE
└─ Multiple sources? → RCLONEPro tip: Rclone can mount SFTP just like SSHFS, but with added benefits like caching. Consider
rclone mount sftp:when you need SSHFS functionality with better performance over slow connections.
Bottom line: Use SSHFS for simple SSH mounts with real-time access on fast networks. Use Rclone for cloud storage, caching needs, or when working with multiple protocols.
How is this guide?