Alternatives

SSHFS vs Rclone

Comparing SSHFS and Rclone - SSH mounting vs cloud storage sync

SSHFS mounts remote filesystems over SSH, while Rclone syncs to cloud storage. Different tools for different remote access needs!

Quick comparison

FeatureSSHFSRclone
Primary UseMount SSH serversCloud storage ops
ProtocolSSH/SFTP onlyMultiple protocols
Operation TypeReal-time mountBatch sync/mount
Cloud Support❌ No✅ 70+ providers
PerformanceNetwork-dependentCan cache locally
Setup ComplexitySimple (SSH only)Varies by provider

Key differences

SSHFS (SSH filesystem mount)

  • Mounts remote SSH server as local folder
  • Real-time access with no local storage used
  • Simple setup—just need SSH access
  • Every operation goes directly over network

Rclone (multi-protocol tool)

  • Syncs, copies, and mounts various storage types
  • Supports 70+ cloud providers and protocols
  • Optional caching for better performance
  • Can also mount SFTP (like SSHFS) with extra features

When to use each tool

ScenarioBetter ChoiceWhy
Edit code on remote serverSSHFSReal-time, direct SSH access
Access Google Drive filesRcloneNative cloud support
Browse remote Linux serverSSHFSSimple, immediate access
Backup server to cloudRcloneDirect cloud upload
Development on remoteSSHFSLow latency for edits

Common Commands

SSHFS examples:

sshfs user@server:/path /local/mount           # Basic mount
sshfs user@server:/ /mnt -o reconnect          # With auto-reconnect
sshfs -p 2222 user@server:/ /mnt/remote        # Custom port

Rclone examples:

rclone mount gdrive: /mnt/gdrive --daemon      # Mount cloud
rclone mount sftp: /mnt/server --daemon        # Mount SFTP (like SSHFS!)
rclone mount remote: /mnt --vfs-cache-mode full # With caching

Performance & Features

What SSHFS Does Better

  • Simplicity: Just SSH, no configuration needed
  • Real-time: Changes are immediate on server
  • Low overhead: Minimal local resources used
  • Direct access: No sync delays or conflicts

What Rclone Offers Instead

  • Caching: Can cache files locally for speed
  • Cloud native: Direct integration with cloud APIs
  • Versatility: Mount, sync, copy, serve capabilities
  • Resilience: Better retry and error handling
# SSHFS - direct but network-dependent
sshfs user@server:/ /mnt

# Rclone - can cache for performance
rclone mount sftp:/ /mnt --vfs-cache-mode full

Decision matrix

Need to mount remote files?
├─ SSH server only?
│  ├─ Simple mount? → SSHFS
│  ├─ Need caching? → Rclone SFTP
│  └─ Real-time edit? → SSHFS
├─ Cloud storage? → RCLONE
└─ Multiple sources? → RCLONE

Pro tip: Rclone can mount SFTP just like SSHFS, but with added benefits like caching. Consider rclone mount sftp: when you need SSHFS functionality with better performance over slow connections.

Bottom line: Use SSHFS for simple SSH mounts with real-time access on fast networks. Use Rclone for cloud storage, caching needs, or when working with multiple protocols.

How is this guide?